Paolo Di Canio is an insane fascist. I’m not trying to be inflammatory; these are simply words that describe Paolo Di Canio. He’s an insane fascist in the same way that he’s 45 and Italian and cadaverously thin. He’s an insane fascist in the same way that he’s lined and balding and the wearer of elongated sideburns that make him look like a Victorian railroad magnate. He’s an insane fascist in the same way that he’s an ex-soccer star and, as of this week, the recently fired ex-manager of the Premier League club Sunderland AFC.
Those earlier Arsenal teams did as they pleased, and not with the aristocratic gradualism of mid-2000s Milan or the oddly childish relentlessness of Barcelona. They just tore through you. They raced the ball up the pitch, fast but also somehow perfectly under control, and whipped it at the net. Then they gave it back to you. Then they took it from you and started again. They were an astonishing fusion of masterful and giddy. Wenger used to get on a high horse every once in a while about football as entertainment and value for the fan’s hard-earned shilling, but what stands out about those teams now is not simply that they were entertaining but that they were also in some way explanatory: They played soccer, a game whose disorder frequently verges on madness, at such a high level that you could watch them and understand the sport in a new way. They made sanity intensely compelling.
So you know the classic Landon Donovan drinking fountain photo? Turns out it’s not even the craziest image from the photo spread in which it first appeared. My new Grantland column revisits a very strange moment in American soccer history.
This last point can’t be emphasized enough. If there’s a crowning irony in American soccer during the MLS era, it’s that we were finally given a superstar, something we always wanted — only the superstar managed to embody almost everything about U.S. soccer culture that we were trying to escape. Soccer was seen as a soft, unmanly sport, a sort of dainty French teatime exercise for socialists, and our superstar made major career moves out of homesickness. Soccer was seen as hopelessly white-bread and suburban, forever entangled with minivans and juice boxes and parents with folding chairs, and our superstar was a white kid from the Inland Empire who looked like Dave Matthews and dressed like someone who owned Dave Matthews CDs. Soccer was seen as an electromagnet for faux-intellectual Europhiles and poseurs; here is an interview from May in which Donovan talks about how much he likes reading Rilke.
Over on Grantland, I have a preview of the Champions League final. Things it includes: a dramatization of the creation of the English language, a definitive guide to defending Arjen Robben, and a very lovely picture of a horse. Enjoy!
What made Alex Ferguson the definitive manager of the Premier League era wasn’t only the wins; it was also the way he embodied all the contradictions of modern football. Here’s my new Grantland column.
Seeing your future not only defeat your past, not only taunt your past, but drop your past from high above into the path of an oncoming sport-utility vehicle — try to imagine the sensation that gave me. To see your past lose all its defenses, to see it exposed as a naked, mortal, vulnerable thing. A moment ago I overheard a woman coming out of the Qdoba say to her companion, “That was one weird burrito bowl.” I have considered her words, and I have realized that, with the economy of a poet, she has described what the Champions League semifinal was for me.
Matt Le Tissier is coming out of retirement, and I’m going to type that again, because it contains words that deserve to be repeated. Matt Le Tissier is coming out of retirement. If you don’t know who that is — and there’s a good chance you don’t, if you’re American, not a soccer fan, or under 25 — watch the YouTube clip of him scoring against Newcastle on October 24, 1993. This is the second season of the Premier League, all lunging tackles and signboards for Street Fighter II. Le Tissier’s playing midfield for Southampton, the team in red-and-white stripes. The ball comes flying over the left flank to the Southampton striker, Iain Dowie, who heads it down toward the middle of the pitch, where Le Tissier’s running forward at a smooth trot. It’s a bad header; the ball scuds directly behind him. The move should be over. But watch what Le Tissier does….
I am a midlevel Hungarian gangster. You are a Finnish referee. So here’s how it works. I get a call from a lieutenant in the syndicate — not from Dan Tan himself, the boss has to be protected, but from a middle man somewhere in Asia. Maybe Singapore, where Dan Tan is based; maybe someplace else. The caller says: We need so-and-so to happen in such-and-such soccer game. So I fly to Helsinki from Budapest and take a train north to Tampere, where you’ll be officiating a match in the Ykkönen, the Finnish second division, between FC Ilves and FC Viikingit. We meet. It’s not as if I’m lugging a duffel full of cash. The money will be laundered; we have the systems in place. I want you to be comfortable, after all.
Abramovich is a week removed from sacking Roberto Di Matteo, a beloved former Chelsea player who managed the club for eight months and won both the FA Cup and the Champions League. You would have to be a self-deluding megalomaniac to see coaching Chelsea as anything other than a path to a short-term payoff. And Rafa has enacted the same bighorn-sheep-in-spring routine at every club he’s managed; you would have to be a self-deluding megalomaniac to hire him thinking he’d fall in line and do whatever you asked. So, yeah. Good thing neither of these guys is a megalomaniac, right?
I’m sick of Manchester United. In many ways, this is a compliment to Manchester United. When your emperor is cruel and merciless and rules from his twisted iron throne for like a million consecutive years, your pathetic longing for revolution is just proof that he’s great at oppressing you. If Manchester United weren’t permanently welded to the top or near-top of the Premier League table like the star on a Christmas tree no one throws out till May, I wouldn’t have had all this leisure time to accrue malevolent emotions toward their consistency and their stock prices and their players and their stupid face. Great job, Manchester United!
In other ways, however, this is not a compliment to Manchester United, because it is never a compliment when someone would rather see a goat, or Tottenham Hotspur, win the title over you. And the way I feel lately, if you rustled up a Siberian ibex that could score away at Stoke, I would wear its scarf every Saturday and cheer it on at the Theatre of Dreams. I would say the same thing about Tottenham Hotspur, but I’m trying to be realistic.
TOTALLY UNRELATED TO SOCCER: I wrote a few tweets about last night’s episode of Mad Men, then realized a million DVR-people would yell at me for spoiling it, so I moved them here. Read if you care. There are spoilers, duh.
Ever been tabbed to speak at someone’s going away party?
It’s a more exigent task than you’d imagine. It necessitates an examination of your relationship with that person yet simultaneously compels you to divorce yourself from it, because if you truly care about them, it becomes impossible not feel a little sad, a little hurt, a little abandoned that they’re moving on.
As the captain of a midtable side, I imagine Antonio Di Natale is well-versed in that conflict, at least in psyche if not actual practice. From David Pizarro to Vincenzo Iaquinta, Fabio Quagliarella to Alexis Sanchez, Di Natale has watched his contemporaries at Udinese saunter out the door for better opportunities at bigger clubs, leaving him to recite staid dialogue and dutifully hand out cake before shouldering another share of club’s ballast. Somewhere along the way, he became Sam Waterston in Law & Order, perpetually standing still as his recast cohorts drift further away from his date of birth but stubbornly refusing to start over someplace else. And — as is also the case with Waterston — you invariably stumble upon at least one Udinese match per season when you weren’t even looking for one, only to find Di Natale making one of his usual imperious runs through traffic and you incredulously blurting out things like, “Wait, he’s still there?!” and, “Doesn’t he have somewhere else better to be?”
Do you know what hate, in its essence and heart-wrenching ugliness, truly is? Not only the concept of genuinely disliking something with every fibre of your being, but the sensation of slowly falling into a black hole filled to its brink with unhealthy, dirty thoughts? It is a feeling that, when activated deep below our day-to-day, unextraordinary consciousness, completely robs us of our humanity and compassion. It brings out the worst in us. Basically, hatred is what keeps Turkish football in 2011-2012 alive.
Today, my newfound and football-crazed friends, we have reached the proverbial impasse. Regardless of what happens tonight at the Şükrü Saracoğlu Stadium in Kadıköy, Turkish football has lost its vigour. Papers were definitely pushed, Lira in great quantities were definitely suddenly found in sports bags where they did not quite belong, and the Turkish Football Federation has made a complete and utter mess of the proceedings and an even bigger ass of themselves. 10 people have been given jail sentences for bribing players, staff members, club officials in order to fix scores (“bought matches”, in layman terms). All the criminals acted, in one way or another, to give a certain club a certain edge, and yet said club has remained without judgement or penalty. So, in this final week of Turkish football in what will forever be known as a truly tainted season, quelle surprise, as Platini would say: It’s all about Fenerbahçe again, standing as ever in the spotlight and on their very own stage this time around, with Galatasaray trucking along on the ride in a supporting role.
It is January 25, 1939. You reside in what is left of Barcelona. The Spanish Civil War has raged for several years. At night, the bombs fall. Franco’s forces have surrounded and strangled your beloved city, Within, moral and societal decay have gripped the institutions you loved. At first, democracy was the war cry. Viva la Republica! Then, the anarchists arose and spoke of the need to collectivize, collectivize, collectivize. Then, the Stalinists sprang up and called for nationalization. The summary executions of suspected Franco sympathizers made you feel uneasy. Now, the anarchists and Stalinists shoot one another in broad daylight. Food and water have disappeared. Retreating Republic forces burn warehouses & offices before fleeing to France. When Franco’s forces arrive the next day, chills run up and down your spine. To your astonishment, people take to the streets and cheer and applaud and wave and welcome their arrival. You weep quietly.
It is April 26, 2012. You are Pep Guardiola. You are the coach of FC Barcelona, a team that has won three La Liga titles and two Champions League trophies in the last four years. Some injuries and bad luck derailed the current season, but plenty of talent lines the roster. The city adores your team, your players love you, and the best goalscoring machine in the world wears the Azulgrana #10. However, for the last few years, battles have raged behind the scenes. The President that hired you, Joan Laporta, has been sued by the current President Sandro Rossell for accounting irregularities. The same Sandro Rosell that sat at the Board of Directors for Barcelona but resigned in 2005 due to Laporta’s “authoritarian tendencies.” Rather than settling, the case went to trial. In sum, your current boss is running your ex-boss (who hired you) through the accounting grinder, even though hidden debt in Spain is as ubiquitous as sangria. At least Laporta took care of the tax man, unlike Atletico de Madrid. Your hair turns grey, then disappears. The next day, you announce your retirement.
Cue the End-of-an-Era music: Pep Guardiola has resigned. But from this vantage point what seems clear is that Pep’s departure, and all the accompanying verbiage — about the intensity of his personality, his perfectionism, the hardware his team has won over the past four years, the success of the Barcelona Way, Pep as the embodiment of the més que un club ethos, and on and on — are part of a vast mopping-up operation. The story really ended almost exactly a year ago, when El Clásico descended into melodrama and handbags. Barça hasn’t been the same since, and neither has Pep.
I wrote at the time that “if I were Emperor of Soccer, I’d not allow these clubs to play each other for a couple of years.” But really, the damage had already been done. Too many overwrought encounters in too short a time had left Barcelona, Real Madrid, the Spanish soccer culture, and, hell, the whole soccer world emotionally exhausted. What had been the most exciting clash of styles in forever became instead an exercise in discovering new forms of pettiness: diving, stomping, pre- and post-match posturing, even a combination cheek-tweak and eye-gouge.
Dick Clark is dead. As someone who expected to be outlived by him, it’s weird knowing he’s gone. At the same time, he was clearly an old man. Even though it seemed like he’d been around for longer than his 82 years, the most recent New Year’s was sad because…well, it was Dick Clark, except he wasn’t Dick Clark as everyone knew him. It finally seemed like it might’ve been time, as cruel as that is to say.
It never seemed like Frankie Hejduk’s time. No, he’s not dead, but he’s done playing soccer. The scraggly-haired wingback announced his retirement from professional soccer Thursday at the age of 37, which is pretty damn old for a professional soccer player. And it’s really damn old for someone who played like he was stuck in an imaginary hamster wheel—never not-running. It’s hard to imagine Frankie Hejduk not running for a living any more. It’s hard, too, to imagine American soccer without Frankie Hejduk.
Watching Swansea City play is like reading Proust. There are more than a few forgettable moments, scattered throughout longer moments of wandering beauty, sudden whimsy, and fluttering brilliance, seemingly going nowhere and seemingly without end. Everything builds and builds and builds without any obvious narrative structure. As the tension breaks their game becomes more sprawling, and more strange. It’s easy to get lost. Once lost, it’s easy to lose sense of time, and place. No team in the Premier League is as watchable and as unwatchable as Swansea. And no team inspires the depth of praise and breadth of indifference.
Earlier this season Swansea played Liverpool to a scoreless draw. The game was brilliant. Andy Carroll was comically feckless. So too was Liverpool’s midfield. Michel Vorm essentially attacked Liverpool’s forwards from his goal, which is an odd phrase and even odder thought, but there really isn’t another way to put it. The overwhelming presence of the ball in the midfield looked, from a distance, the way the game being played in the imagination of someone who’d never seen a game before, and only heard it described charitably, if not also a little wistfully.
Many years ago I attended an MLS game. It featured a forward who was having a shocker. Every time he got the ball, he lost it, either by having the opposition defenders take the ball off him, or by misplacing a pass. His team’s attacks would flounder as soon as he was brought into them. He did not create space by clever positioning or astute runs, he seemed to be a dead weight, bringing his team down. I asked my friend Eric, who was there with me, why the player was in the team at all. Eric replied, after acknowledging that the forward was having a bad game: “The thing about Taylor Twellman is that he’ll go through a meat grinder if he thinks there’s a goal on the other side.” And sure enough, there came a chance which Twellman pounced on. After a corner the ball was loose in the six yard box. Three defenders and the goalkeeper all threw themselves at the bouncing ball but Twellman got there first, the ball ricocheting off his shins into the goal, the defenders kicking nothing but air and Twellman’s legs.
I thought of Taylor Twellman when I saw Mario Gómez’s goal against Real Madrid in the Champions League semifinal. The ball entered the six-yard box and a couple of players threw themselves at the bouncing ball but Gómez got there first and got the winner. While I like Gómez, he seems like an especially decent guy and he helped my beloved Stuttgart to their most recent Bundesliga title, he is not the complete striking package. He does not hold the ball up well, his finishing is far from clinical, his dribbling skills do not keep defenders rooted to the spot and his first touch is decent, but not special. In fact, in most regards, Mario Gómez is decent, but not special. Except for the fact that he will go through a meat grinder if he thinks there is a goal on the other side.
Why are soccer players so bad at throw-ins? In any given soccer match the rate of throw-in failure is shockingly high. The problems come in three general varieties.
Excess of ambition. A teammate stands unmarked five yards from the thrower-in, so that nothing would be easier than to toss the ball at his feet, receive a one-touch return, and then construct a possession. But no. The ambitious thrower-in scorns so simple a solution. He spies, right at or just beyond the range of his throwing prowess, another teammate surrounded by three opposing players. Yes, that’s the ticket. He heaves the ball in that direction and the other team gratefully takes possession.
General lassitude. The thrower-in may be ready to do something sensible, but his teammates don’t give him a chance. They just stand around, usually too far away for him to throw the ball their way, keeping company with their markers. The thrower-in takes one hand off the ball to point them towards open spaces. Their chief response to this is to stare at him. After a few nervous moments one or two of them may slide an ineffectual yard this way or that. Eventually the ball gets tossed semi-randomly onto the pitch and the other team gratefully takes possession.
Paralysis by analysis. An extreme form of the hesitation induced by either of the prior circumstances. Sometimes the thrower-in just can’t make a decision, either because of his own ambition or his teammates’ lassitude or, in some few cases, a deep-seated psychic disability, possibly induced by early experiences in candy stores. Symptoms here include spasmodic and incomprehensible gestures with one hand, as the other clutches the ball; swift, panicky twisting of the neck, accompanied by bulging eyes; and a crab-like creeping up the pitch (the most common variation on which resembles a beginner’s attempt to tango). Eventually the ball gets tossed semi-randomly onto the pitch etc. etc.
Thomas Vermaelen seems to think that he’s a basketball player. His constant dream is to steal the ball from an opposing attacker, dribble the length of the court/pitch, and score at the other end. Early in Saturday’s match against QPR, he got excited when Adel Taarabt received possession just outside the area, and flicked a boot at the ball in an awkward steal attempt. Taarabt simply pivoted, dribbled towards the goal, and clipped a shot past Szczesny, who looked at Vermaelen and spread his arms in the beaten keeper’s usual what-were-you-doing gesture.
Unfazed by this, Vermaelen almost immediately dribbled most of the length of the pitch before passing to an offside Van Persie; his slow trot back to a defensive position seemed reluctant. A couple of minutes after that he tried once more to steal the ball, this time from Bobby Zamora, who also turned easily away from him. (Fortunately for Arsenal, this happened a long way from goal, and Mikel Arteta hustled back to cover for his teammate.) In the second half Vermaelen slipped and fell when trying to mark Jamie Mackie, which led to an easy goal (the match winner, as it turned out) by Samba Diakite. Maybe not his fault — it was a lousy pitch at Loftus Road — but only a minute or so later he rushed out to the center of the pitch to attempt yet another steal, and seemed both surprised and relieved when he wasn’t called for a foul.
Vermaelen is pretty quick, quite strong, good on the ball, and dangerous in the air — in short, a very talented player. He’s Arsenal’s vice-captain, which suggests that he has the respect of coaches and teammates. But he demonstrates less positional awareness that any defender I can think of, and has Joey Barton-level impulse control. (Though at least his impulses rarely lead him to punch or kick people.)
It seems to me that Vermaelen’s role in the Arsenal team tells us three things: first, that coaches and players alike love energy and enthusiasm, even when misplaced; second, that hope springs eternal that talented players will eventually, somehow, see the error of their ways and start playing intelligently; and third, that Arsène Wenger really, really, really needs to spend some money on another central defender.
Harry Johnston was an outstanding defender who played nearly twenty years for Blackpool, mostly as a center-back. He was so good that in 1951 the FA named him footballer of the year. He played for his country as well, making his last appearance in 1953, at Wembley, against the upstart Magyars from Hungary, but that would not be a good day for Harry. The problem was Nándor Hidegkuti.
Hungary kicked off to start the game, and moved the ball into English territory. A long pass down the right flank was knocked out of bounds: possession to Hungary. But the referee ruled that on the throw-in the Hungarian player had stepped into the field of play and gave possession to England. The Hungarians intercepted and passed to Hidegkuti, centrally located, outside the box. He was, the English understood, a center-forward, so it wasn’t clear what he might be doing quite so far from the goal. Harry Johnston backed off a bit. Hidegkuti faked a shot (or maybe a pass) to his right, paused an instant, then pushed the ball a yard or so forward, just into the box now, and simply lashed a shot into the upper-left corner of of the net. Forty-five seconds had elapsed.
Around 11 p.m. last Monday, Caleb Porter was wearing a pained, tight expression, like a man who’d elaborately prepared an orange for eating – peeled it, scraped its white resins off the delicate inner skin, sectioned it; perhaps opened a beverage suitable for the side; sat himself somewhere comfortable, with entertainment, orange and beverage at hand – only to find that the orange was not an orange all along, but was instead an artistic evocation of one’s career hopes vanishing forever, and so every choice thereby proved wrong in that moment. No orange, but an orange-suitable entertainment. And orange-suitable beverage! But no orange. His expression pained and tight. In short, a man in crisis.
Hard not to be pained. He had just seen his second highly-touted keeper of the game (Sean Johnson; the first was Bill Hamid of DC United, who sprained his ankle, insisted he was fine, and gave up two goals in the following three minutes before discovering his injury belatedly) fumble the third goal-against of the final game of the rest of his freaking life (when compared with, for example, coaching the Akron Zips in Spring Soccer!!) into the net, sending El Salvador on to play Honduras, and sending Caleb Porter on to coach the Akron Zips in Spring Soccer!! instead of leading the USA onto Wembley in the London Olympic Games.
Yesterday, Real Madrid President Florentino Perez announced that his club would build a $1 billion luxury resort on an island in the United Arab Emirates. The complex isn’t scheduled to open until 2015, but using computer-generated imagery released by the club, we’ve put together a preview so real you can practically hear the sex tapes. Read on for the ultimate in twenty-first century decadence.
“Real Madrid Resort Island will be a major tourist and sporting center of great dimensions and the highest level. This extraordinary complex will attract millions of people looking for quality leisure services.”—Real Madrid President Florentino Perez, announcing the club’s plans for a $1 billion Financial Fair Play money-laundering device resort island in the UAE
Here’s my new Grantland piece about Muamba. I wrote most of this on Tuesday, and since then, a sort of Muamba backlash has emerged, made up of people who think we’re talking too much about Muamba, or feeling too much about Muamba, or talking and feeling about Muamba in the wrong ways. This was probably inevitable; columnists need grist, and someone will be annoyed by any consensus, even when it’s confined to basic human empathy. Suffice it to say that the main points of the backlash so far — “this isn’t about your feelings” / “unseemly public grief” / “Princess Di & Michael Jackson” / “quit congratulating football for doing what it was supposed to do” — all seem very much worth ignoring to me.
Millions of people just watched a likable young person nearly die and then somehow survive after his heart had stopped beating on its own for 78 minutes. It’s okay to have a feeling about that, regardless of what angry cultural commentators say. It’s even okay to be a little bit inspired by a glimpse of the universe breaking in favor of someone who deserved it.